* chore!: remove Proctortrack dependency
Remove all Proctortrack dependencies from the project, including:
- Python package dependencies in requirements files
- JavaScript package dependency in package.json
- Translation configuration in conf/locale/config.yaml
BREAKING CHANGE: Proctortrack proctoring provider is no longer available as a dependency.
This change removes the Proctortrack Dependency while preserving code references.
* feat: Update the package lock
* chore: Updating the requirements
* chore: Updating the requirements2
* chore: Clean up comments in github.in
Remove comment about django42 support pending release.
* The `conf/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES` folder does not get automatically
created by other tooling so message extraction to that folder fails.
* The `gettext_fallback.js` file should not be getting picked up for
translation since it's there only to be used when the the language
gettext catalog is not available
As part of the static asset build, JS modules for most built-in XBlocks were
unnecessarily copied from the original locations (under xmodule/js and
common/static/js) to a git-ignored location (under common/static/xmodule), and
then included into the Webpack builld via
common/static/xmodule/webpack.xmodule.config.js.
With this commit, we stop copying the JS modules. Instead, we have
common/static/xmodule/webpack.xmodule.config.js just reference the original
source under xmodule/js and common/static/js.
This lets us us radically simplify the xmodule/static_content.py build script.
It also sets the stage for the next change, in which we will check
webpack.xmodule.config.js into the repository, and delete
xmodule/static_content.py entirely.
common/static/xmodule/webpack.xmodule.config.js before:
module.exports = {
"entry": {
"AboutBlockDisplay": [
"./common/static/xmodule/modules/js/000-b82f6c436159f6bc7ca2513e29e82503.js",
"./common/static/xmodule/modules/js/001-3ed86006526f75d6c844739193a84c11.js",
"./common/static/xmodule/modules/js/002-3918b2d4f383c04fed8227cc9f523d6e.js",
"./common/static/xmodule/modules/js/003-b3206f2283964743c4772b9d72c67d64.js",
"./common/static/xmodule/modules/js/004-274b8109ca3426c2a6fde9ec2c56e969.js",
"./common/static/xmodule/modules/js/005-26caba6f71877f63a7dd4f6796109bf6.js"
],
"AboutBlockEditor": [
"./common/static/xmodule/descriptors/js/000-b82f6c436159f6bc7ca2513e29e82503.js",
"./common/static/xmodule/descriptors/js/001-19c4723cecaa5a5a46b8566b3544e732.js"
],
// etc
}
};
common/static/xmodule/webpack.xmodule.config.js after:
module.exports = {
"entry": {
"AboutBlockDisplay": [
"./xmodule/js/src/xmodule.js",
"./xmodule/js/src/html/display.js",
"./xmodule/js/src/javascript_loader.js",
"./xmodule/js/src/collapsible.js",
"./xmodule/js/src/html/imageModal.js",
"./xmodule/js/common_static/js/vendor/draggabilly.js"
],
"AboutBlockEditor": [
"./xmodule/js/src/xmodule.js",
"./xmodule/js/src/html/edit.js"
],
// etc
}
};
Part of: https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/issues/32481
This PR addresses the renaming of the contentstore/xblock_services folder to contentstore/xblock_storage_handlers as a follow-up to PR #32282. The renaming is done to prevent naming conflicts with xblock runtime services and to make the purpose of the files more understandable. The file xblock_service.py has been renamed to view_handlers.py to better reflect its functionality.
Justification and Future Refactoring Outlook:
The xblock_storage_handlers folder contains service methods that implement the business logic for view endpoints located in contentstore/views/block.py. It is renamed to xblock_storage_handlers to reflect its responsibility of handling storage-related operations of xblocks, such as creation, retrieval, and deletion.
The view_handlers.py file includes business methods called by the view endpoints. These methods, such as handle_xblock, delete_orphans, etc., interact with the required modulestore methods, handle any errors, and aggregate and serialize data for the response.
The term 'handler' in the context of 'view_handlers.py' represents methods that facilitate business logic for view endpoints. It is critical to note the distinction between these 'handler methods' and the xblock_handler method. The xblock_handler is a view endpoint itself, residing in contentstore/views/block.py, and is well known in this context. Although its name might suggest otherwise, it is not a handler in the sense of the 'handler methods' we've defined in 'view_handlers.py'. To maintain consistency with existing naming conventions, it remains as xblock_handler.
