In ~Palm and earlier, all built-in XBlock Sass was included into CMS
(and LMS) styles before being compiled. So, if a site theme was meant to
affect built-in XBlock styling, those changes would be manifested
directly in the base CMS CSS that is included into every single Studio
page. When the user provided the `?site_theme` querystring parameter,
which is intended to allow devs & admins to view Studio through a given
theme, CMS would look up the given theme and serve the corresponding
base CMS CSS, which would affect the built-in XBlocks views (as
expected).
After ~Palm, built-in XBlocks styles are handled more similarly to to
pure XBlock styles, in that they are only requested when CMS tries to
render the block. In Studio, blocks are not rendered by the original
request, but by a subsequent AJAX request to the `/container_preview`
enpoint. Thus, passing the `?site_theme` query parameter to the original
request will apply the given theme to Studio's chrome, but the theme
will _not_ apply to built-in XBlock views, whose CSS is now loaded via
async request.
To fix this, we simply pass Studio's querystring parameters (including
`?site_theme`) along to the `/container_view` AJAX request. This will
cause CMS to correctly serve the built-in XBlock CSS from the theme
specified by `?site_theme`, rather than whatever the current theme is.
Part of: https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/issues/32292
In ~Palm and earlier, all built-in XBlock Sass was included into LMS and CMS
styles before being compiled. The generated CSS was coupled together with
broader LMS/CMS CSS. This means that comprehensive themes have been able to
modify built-in XBlock appearance by setting certain Sass variables. We say that
built-in XBlock Sass was, and is expected to be, "theme-aware".
Shortly after Palm, we decoupled XBlock Sass from LMS and CMS Sass [1]. Each
built-in block's Sass is now compiled into two separate CSS targets, one for
block editing and one for block display. The CSS, now located at
`common/static/css/xmodule`, is injected into the running Webpack context with
the new `XModuleWebpackLoader`. Built-in XBlocks already used
`add_webpack_to_fragment` in order to add JS Webpack bundles to their view
fragments, so when CSS was added to Webpack, it Just Worked.
This unlocked a slieu of simplifications for static asset processing [2];
however, it accidentally made XBlock Sass theme-*unaware*, or perhaps
theme-confused, since the CSS was targeted at `common/static/css/xmodule`
regardless of the theme. The result of this is that **built-in XBlock views will
use CSS based on the Sass variables _last theme to be compiled._** Sass
variables are only used in a handful of places in XBlocks, so the bug is subtle,
but it is there for those running off of master. For example, using edX.org's
theme on master, we can see that there is a default blue underline in the Studio
sequence nav [3]. With this bugfix, it becomes the standard edX.org
greenish-black [4].
This commit makes several changes, firstly to fix the bug, and secondly to leave
ourselves with a more comprehensible asset setup in the `xmodule/` directory.
* We remove the `XModuleWebpackLoader`, thus taking built-in XBlock Sass back
out of Webpack.
* We compile XBlock Sass not to `common/static/css/xmodule`, but to:
* `[lms|cms]/static/css` for the default theme, and
* `<THEME_ROOT>/[lms|cms]/static/css`, for any custom theme.
This is where the comprehensive theming system expects to find themable
assets. Unfortunately, this does mean that the Sass is compiled twice, both
for LMS and CMS. We would have liked to compile it once to somewhere in the
`common/`, but comprehensive theming does not consider `common/` assets to be
themable.
* We split `add_webpack_to_fragment` into two more specialized functions:
* `add_webpack_js_to_fragment` , for adding *just* JS from a Webpack bundle,
and
* `add_sass_to_fragment`, for adding static links to CSS compiled themable
Sass (not Webpack). Both these functions are moved to a new module
`xmodule/util/builtin_assets.py`, since the original module
(`xmodule/util/xmodule_django.py`) didn't make a ton of sense.
* In an orthogonal bugfix, we merge Sass `CourseInfoBlock`, `StaticTabBlock`,
`AboutBlock` into the `HtmlBlock` Sass files. The first three were never used,
as their styling was handled by `HtmlBlock` (their shared parent class).
* As a refactoring, we change Webpack bundle names and Sass module names to be
less misleading:
* student_view, public_view, and author_view: was `<Name>BlockPreview`, is now
`<Name>BlockDisplay`.
* studio_view: was `<Name>BlockStudio`, is now `<Name>BlockEditor`.
* As a refactoring, we move the contents of `xmodule/static` into the existing
`xmodule/assets` directory, and adopt its simper structure. We now have:
* `xmodule/assets/*.scss`: Top-level compiled Sass modules. These could be
collapsed away in a future refactoring.
* `xmodule/assets/<blocktype>/*`: Resources for each block, including both JS
modules and Sass includes (underscore-prefixed so that they aren't
compiled). This structure maps closely with what externally-defined XBlocks
do.
* `xmodule/js` still exists, but it will soon be folded into the
`xmodule/assets`.
* We add a new README [4] to explain the new structure, and also update a
docstring in `openedx/lib/xblock/utils` which had fallen out of date with
reality.
* Side note: We avoid the term "XModule" in all of this, because that's
(thankfully) become a much less useful/accurate way to describe these blocks.
Instead, we say "built-in XBlocks".
Refs:
1. https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/pull/32018
2. https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/issues/32292
3. https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/assets/3628148/8b44545d-0f71-4357-9385-69d6e1cca86f
4. https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/assets/3628148/d0b7b309-b8a4-4697-920a-8a520e903e06
5. https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/tree/master/xmodule/assets#readme
Part of: https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/issues/32292
* feat: added notifications for discussions app
* feat: added unit tests for handler
* feat: updated openedx-events package
* fix: updated notification creation logic and tests
* refactor: updated openedx-event version and event name
* refactor: moved logic to separate methods
This PR addresses the renaming of the contentstore/xblock_services folder to contentstore/xblock_storage_handlers as a follow-up to PR #32282. The renaming is done to prevent naming conflicts with xblock runtime services and to make the purpose of the files more understandable. The file xblock_service.py has been renamed to view_handlers.py to better reflect its functionality.
Justification and Future Refactoring Outlook:
The xblock_storage_handlers folder contains service methods that implement the business logic for view endpoints located in contentstore/views/block.py. It is renamed to xblock_storage_handlers to reflect its responsibility of handling storage-related operations of xblocks, such as creation, retrieval, and deletion.
The view_handlers.py file includes business methods called by the view endpoints. These methods, such as handle_xblock, delete_orphans, etc., interact with the required modulestore methods, handle any errors, and aggregate and serialize data for the response.
The term 'handler' in the context of 'view_handlers.py' represents methods that facilitate business logic for view endpoints. It is critical to note the distinction between these 'handler methods' and the xblock_handler method. The xblock_handler is a view endpoint itself, residing in contentstore/views/block.py, and is well known in this context. Although its name might suggest otherwise, it is not a handler in the sense of the 'handler methods' we've defined in 'view_handlers.py'. To maintain consistency with existing naming conventions, it remains as xblock_handler.
* feat: add pagination in course enrollment list API
* refactor: enrollment course list API
* refactor: follow best practice in course enrollment list API
Otherwise we're not really respecting the package-lock file and won't get
repeatable results.
Also:
- Clean up old error handling for npm<3. Were on npm 8 now. Probably
can get rid of this.
- Use the shorthand `npm ci` rather than `npm clean-install` just for
consistency with code elsewhere.
- Update comments in tests to be explicit about use of ci rather than
install
* Swagger was renamed to OpenAPI at some point so use the new name for
clarity.
* Prefix with `lms` to make it clear that these are the APIs from the
LMS and may not all be available in the CMS.
* This project was not being published anywhere.
* The previous commit that adds openapi generation capabilities to the
`docs/guides` replaces what this was doing.
Don't assume that there will be an extra `context` kwarg when using the
bookmark serializer. We use it this way in the current code but that's
specific to us and not comon to all serializers. There are a lot of API
documentation tools that automate introspecting serializers but they
won't know that they have to send in a `context` to the serializer.
To make this serializer behave more like other serializers without
changing the behavior, we just need to check that the `context` value is
defined before we dig into it. In the case that there is no `context`
we just treat it the same as if there is no `request` in the `context`.
