Currently, ./xmodule/ unit tests are only run with LMS settings. However,
./common/ and ./xmodule/ are run twice: once with LMS settings and once with
CMS settings.
Just like ./common/ and ./openedx/, the unit tests in ./xmodule/ validate
behavior in both LMS and CMS. So, order to fully test ./xmodule/, we should to
run its tests with CMS settings too.
This will enable us to better validate certain LibraryContentBlocks behaviors
being touched by https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/pull/33263 which can't
be expressed under LMS settings.
Also in this commit:
* refactor: rename the shards to be clear whether they're running under LMS or CMS
* docs: correct comments regarding conditions under which codejail's
test_cant_do_something_forbidden is skipped.
* test: update a unit test which was using the now-deleted library_sourced block to use
library_content block instead.
* get rid of six.text_type(s)
* get rid of six.b()
* get rid of six.string_types
* get rid of six.PY2/six.PY3
* get rid of six.iteritems() and six.viewvalues()
As part of dissolving our sub-projects in edx-platform, we are moving this package under the xmodule directory.
We have fixed all the occurences of import of this package and also fixed all documents related references.
This might break your platform if you have any reference of `import capa` or `from capa import` in your codebase or in any Xblock.
Ref: https://openedx.atlassian.net/browse/BOM-2582
