Andal.LND/edx-platform
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
60,000 Commits 1 Branch 0 Tags
ae618151a96a20b4435bfadf50dc47f784fa90ea
Commit Graph

31 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
AsadAzam
f721c62555 refactor: Refactor the program configuration string (#28696) 2021-09-09 18:16:39 +05:00
AsadAzam
36283f1a8b feat! Modify DiscussionsConfiguration to allow programs (#28541) 
* feat! Modify DiscussionsConfiguration to allow programs

* feat: add model for program discussions configuration
 2021-09-02 13:25:53 +05:00
Kshitij Sobti
af290ce6a9 feat: Adds a new flag for discussions LTI configuration for admin only config 
Some providers need special considerations when being set up so should only be
configured by people with global staff privileges. This adds an
admin_only_config flag to such providers (only YellowDig for now).
 2021-08-03 20:10:32 +05:00
=Awais Jibran
30ca1804d6 fix: Update provider features list for discussions 
This Pr updates the features list of the discussion providers for,
1. Combines LTI basic configuration and LTI integration into 1 feature.
2.Enables Primary discussion app experience for Yellowdig
3. Hides Automatic learner enrollment from this list

FE changes (in Other PR):
1. Turn edX to Full Support instead of partial support
2. Rename Partial support to Basic support

https://openedx.atlassian.net/browse/TNL-8546
 2021-07-29 18:15:10 +05:00
João Cabrita
0879568023 feat(discussions): Add messages field to provider descriptions 
This adds an `messages` field containing messages relevant
for configuring the provider to the DiscussionsConfigurationView.

Related tickets:
* [TNL-8339](https://openedx.atlassian.net/browse/TNL-8339)
* [TNL-8523](https://openedx.atlassian.net/browse/TNL-8523)
* [BB-4249 (OpenCraft Internal)](https://tasks.opencraft.com/browse/BB-4249)
 2021-07-26 13:51:23 +05:00
Mehak Nasir
79181b3db0 fix:link fix for the yellowdig general documentation 2021-07-14 22:54:09 +05:00
AsadAzam
7212c74713 fix: remove edx-next as a discussion provider (#28059) 2021-06-30 11:08:37 +05:00
AsadAzam
f9082a082e fix: re-order the discussion features (#28046) 2021-06-28 19:13:14 +05:00
Usama Sadiq
2e33565320 fix: fixed the pylint violations causing quality failures (#27934) 2021-06-11 19:49:17 +05:00
Mehak Nasir
222d898e39 refactor: renaming external keys and improved code review fixes 2021-06-10 21:51:08 +05:00
Mehak Nasir
b6f96f25b9 fix: removed google drive link from codebase 2021-06-10 14:17:35 +05:00
Mehak Nasir
d4431455a1 refactor: updated provider map structure and test cases 2021-06-10 12:01:51 +05:00
Mehak Nasir
b9fc89a328 feat: documentation links added in discussion model 2021-06-07 13:57:01 +05:00
Ahtisham Shahid
73226f527b refactor: updated feature names as per convention 2021-05-11 18:20:17 +05:00
Ahtisham Shahid
e025c9bb64 refactor: sorted imports and misc cont renames 2021-05-11 18:20:17 +05:00
Ahtisham Shahid
1a43a4ca29 feat: Added new discussion providers and features 
refactor: Fixed linter issues

refactor: Fixed styling issues

refactor: Code refactor and removed conflicts

refactor: Replaced feature dict with enum
 2021-05-11 18:20:11 +05:00
stvn
c1742b7b66 feat: Add helper for discussions configuration to indicate feature support 2021-04-17 00:52:51 -07:00
stvn
2053da2a9e fix: Update default provider returned by discussions API 2021-04-07 11:54:21 -07:00
stvn
d884967e2c refactor: Split kwargs out to individual lines 
to make further addition/deletion cleaner.
 2021-04-07 11:43:12 -07:00
David Joy
8c6a06cf5b fix: adjust discussions app APIs to match consuming frontend (#27085) 
This commit adjusts a few values in our discussions configuration APIs to make them match what the frontend needs, as well as to more accurately reflect the providers available today.

- The `active` provider ID is expressed as None if it doesn’t exist
- The “cs_comments_service” provider has been renamed “legacy” - when we implement the new discussions micro-frontend, we’ll also have a separate provider for that, so they can’t both be “cs_comments_service”.  Also, cs_comments_service is such a bad name for anything.
- The hard-coded providers list in get_supported_providers now includes ‘legacy’ and ‘piazza’, our two known providers.  This list will be updated as more known providers come online.
- The PROVIDER_FEATURE_MAP has similarly been updated.

Part of this task: TNL-8093
 2021-03-23 13:37:16 -04:00
Usama Sadiq
aa618c460c refactor: remove unused-imports (#27083) 2021-03-19 22:42:14 +05:00
Usama Sadiq
5b9978029e refactor: ran pyupgrade on openedx/core/djangoapps (#26909) 
Ran pyupgrade on {debug, demographics, discussions}.
 2021-03-18 18:37:31 +05:00
stvn
b17bbc8d66 style: Add more type-hints to discussions app 2021-02-10 08:42:05 -08:00
stvn
ef77ddc18d Merge PR #26345 bd03/admin/enabled 
* Commits:
  fix: Add DiscussionsConfiguration.enabled to admin page
 2021-02-10 08:25:16 -08:00
stvn
d52ec518cf style: Cleanup DiscussionsConfiguration.__str__ 
This makes it more useful during debugging, as well as on the Django
Admin page.
 2021-02-03 01:58:23 -08:00
stvn
9df2c4462f fix: Add DiscussionsConfiguration.enabled to admin page 
Without this, we can't edit it via the default view.
 2021-02-03 01:49:07 -08:00
stvn
c36c343c58 style: Fix pylint issues in discussions app 2021-02-02 16:57:39 -08:00
stvn
cff2cb8941 feat: Allow filtering of discussion providers 
Propose and implement organization-wide discussion-provider filtering.

Fixes: TNL-7814
 2021-02-02 06:51:41 -08:00
stvn
c7a4f97ba1 Add get-accessor helper for discussions plugins 2020-12-17 20:08:57 -08:00
stvn
590286f3be Add is_enabled helper for discussions plugins 2020-12-17 19:40:41 -08:00
stvn
39acbf2f21 Implement a new configuration system for discussions plugins 
Additional details available in the attached decisions document.

Co-authored-by: Kshitij Sobti <kshitij@sobti.in>
Co-authored-by: stvn <stvn@mit.edu>
 2020-12-17 18:23:46 -08:00