This feature uses the first_day_of_streak, last_day_of_streak and last_streak_celebration fields to determine whether the user should see a celebration.
AA-304
This reverts commit 0517603b6d.
This was masking a LabXchange error by blowing up with:
"Stack trace builtins:AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'status_code'"
Fixing tests which were failing on running alone.
Main root cause was the mongodb client connection error.
On running all tests this mongodb connection establishes by some other test.
The mobile app is getting unexpected 403s from
/oauth2/exchange_access_token/, but we have been unable
to pinpoint from where they are coming. This commit
introduces a temporary exception handler to provide stack info
for 403s on this endpoint to try to track down the source.
Requires the ENABLE_403_MONITORING setting to be set to
True to enable the logging.
ARCHBOM-1667
We use django-ratelimit to limit per IP login attempts, and then we use
django-ratelimit-backend to limit per username login attempts. This
change replaces the usage of django-ratelimit-backend with another
instance of django-ratelimit so that both limits can be managed by one
library.
This is the first step in being able to fully excise
django-ratelimit-backend from edx-platform. Note that we're still using
the `RateLimitMixin` in openedx/core/djangoapps/oauth_dispatch/dot_overrides/backends.py
because studio and the admin UI still relies on that for rate limiting.
Those login paths will have to be updated before we can remove the mixin
from our auth backend.
Instead of optionally not logging usernames and emails, do so by
default. This mostly removes some complexity from the app and is makes
it so that it's more secure by default.
I considered the question of allowing people to log usernames and
e-mails if they wanted to but opted not to for a couple of reasons:
* It would involve adding a new feature flag that would be the opposite
of the SQUELCH_PII_IN_LOGS which would be a bit confusing. When do you
use which one? or do you need both? etc.
* There is still a way to correlate the messages to eachother and in
most cases also to a specific user(email being the exception).
See context here: https://django-ratelimit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/cookbook/429.html#context
For now we continue to fall back to django's default 403 handler for 403
but provide a new 429 template that we use for ratelimit exceptions.
This commit also updates a logistration test that relied on the old 403
behavior of django-ratelimit instead of the newly added 429 behavior.
