Andal.LND/edx-platform
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Revert "Merge pull request #13461 from edx/cdyer/test-block-types"

Browse Source 
This reverts commit c050ccc318, reversing
changes made to 9ba9772239.
This commit is contained in:
Eric Fischer
2016-09-30 10:06:01 -04:00
parent e00fe03d9d
commit ca287c73c7
9 changed files with 3 additions and 303 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
common/test/data/blocks/capa.xml
View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
<problem url_name="capa-optionresponse">
<optionresponse>
<optioninput options="('Correct', 'Incorrect')" correct="Correct"></optioninput>
<optioninput options="('Correct', 'Incorrect')" correct="Correct"></optioninput>
</optionresponse>
</problem>

25
common/test/data/blocks/coderesponse.xml
View File

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
<problem display_name="Exercise: apply to each 3" markdown="null" weight="5.0">
<text>
<p>
<b>ESTIMATED TIME TO COMPLETE: 4 minutes</b>
</p>
<pre>
&gt;&gt;&gt; print testList
[1, 16, 64, 81]
</pre>
</text>
<coderesponse queuename="Watcher-MITx-6.00x">
<textbox rows="10" cols="80" mode="python" tabsize="4"/>
<codeparam>
<initial_display>
# Your Code Here
</initial_display>
<answer_display>
def square(a):
return a * a
applyToEach(testList, square)
</answer_display>
<grader_payload>{"grader": "finger_exercises/L6/applyToEach3/grade_ate3.py"}</grader_payload>
</codeparam>
</coderesponse>
</problem>

4
common/test/data/blocks/library_content.xml
View File

@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
<library_content display_name="Final Exam" has_score="true" max_count="25" source_library_id="library-v1:MSX+msx_cld213xfinalexam" source_library_version="577b5aca45064f068278faa0">
<problem/>
<problem/>
</library_content>

1
common/test/data/blocks/lti.xml
View File

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
<lti launch_url="http://www.imsglobal.org/developers/LTI/test/v1p1/tool.php" lti_id="ims"/>

87
common/test/data/blocks/openassessment.xml
View File

@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
<openassessment url_name="0e2bbf6cc89e45d98b028fa4e2d46314" allow_file_upload="False">
<title></title>
<assessments>
<assessment name="peer-assessment" must_grade="1" must_be_graded_by="1"/>
<assessment name="self-assessment"/>
</assessments>
<rubric>
<prompt>
Censorship in the Libraries
'All of us can think of a book that we hope none of our children or any
other children have taken off the shelf. But if I have the right to remove
that book from the shelf -- that work I abhor -- then you also have exactly
the same right and so does everyone else. And then we have no books left on
the shelf for any of us.' --Katherine Paterson, Author
Write a persuasive essay to a newspaper reflecting your views on censorship
in libraries. Do you believe that certain materials, such as books, music,
movies, magazines, etc., should be removed from the shelves if they are
found offensive? Support your position with convincing arguments from your
own experience, observations, and/or reading.
Read for conciseness, clarity of thought, and form.
</prompt>
<criterion>
<name>Ideas</name>
<prompt>Determine if there is a unifying theme or main idea.</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>Poor</name>
<explanation>
Difficult for the reader to discern the main idea.
Too brief or too repetitive to establish or maintain a focus.
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>Fair</name>
<explanation>
Presents a unifying theme or main idea, but may
include minor tangents. Stays somewhat focused on topic and
task.
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="5">
<name>Good</name>
<explanation>
Presents a unifying theme or main idea without going
off on tangents. Stays completely focused on topic and task.
</explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
<criterion>
<name>Content</name>
<prompt>Assess the content of the submission</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>Poor</name>
<explanation>
Includes little information with few or no details or
unrelated details. Unsuccessful in attempts to explore any
facets of the topic.
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>Fair</name>
<explanation>
Includes little information and few or no details.
Explores only one or two facets of the topic.
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>Good</name>
<explanation>
Includes sufficient information and supporting
details. (Details may not be fully developed; ideas may be
listed.) Explores some facets of the topic.
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>Excellent</name>
<explanation>
Includes in-depth information and exceptional
supporting details that are fully developed. Explores all
facets of the topic.
</explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
</rubric>
</openassessment>